lanna wrote:
actually no it wasn't about clark. it was just a generalized warning of how petty certain people on here can be if they don't think you fit their mold. still people are nitpicking just to try to prove their point by misconstruing what i said ya'll have a lot of experience with that. do you do it to start fights?
Superman has been on Larryville for quite some time, so why would he need a generalized warning regarding people on this forum? And why a generalized warning? Do you think that others can't figure out what some posters do or don't do? You've moaned and groaned about people treating you as stupid but you are doing the same thing to others with your generalized warning. Again, there is a term for those who accuse others of behaviors they themselves are guilty of and still continue to practice. I'll give you a hint...the term starts with the letter "h".
I am still trying to figure out how you think a "generalized warning" is not picking a fight. There is no misconstruing what you are doing. It is very obvious and very much typical passive-aggressive behavior - make a statement that is inflammatory and then play the victim when the intended response has been provoked. Your constant "explanations" of what you meant further display that behavior.
Just in case you may have forgotten, several of us that you have issue with started out being helpful toward you. Evidence is in the below thread.
http://discuss.larryville.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=37846But your first personal attack (that the archives have on record now since most of the rest have been eliminated) was in the Swapmeet on Mehdi, implying that Mehdi sells stolen goods.
http://discuss.larryville.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=39925Fly even went so far as to tell you he didn't enjoy jumping on your butt but your insinuations about Mehdi (a long time Larryville swapmeet participant) were too much.
You have since gone in and edited many of your posts that were personal attacks on other posters (typing in 123456789). Why don't you stand by your posts? Why edit them if you truly believe what you are saying? It doesn't hide any evidence or make you seem that you are not guilty of all the things you accuse this elusive coven of. in all honesty, it makes it appear that you have something to hide or that you are being dishonest in your postings. You also can't cover it up if someone else has quoted you as evidenced in this thread...
http://discuss.larryville.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=42055There were plenty of people who had issue with your posts on that thread. What happened on early morning April 25th that made you feel you had to go in and edit all the posts that people had issue with?
You attacked me quite a bit in the polygamy thread without any cause. I explained why I didn't vote (issue with the wording of the poll - it was very biased) and gave my opinion on polygamy. Here is an example for you.
I posted this...
Gern_Blanston wrote:
lanna wrote:
i don't believe the apocrapha is a valid book and i don't believe in this lilith crap, since it's not what i was taught as the truth
No one has said you have to believe it. You do however have to accept the fact that other beliefs exist and that they are just as entitled to them as you.
and you responded...
lanna wrote:
um i know there are other religions you dolt. i grew up christian, got drug through almost every church known and now am the religion i am now b/c it allows me to search for the truth. and you can believe what you want but the founding fathers were of the religion that forbade polygamy but not whore hunting
In fact, throughout that entire thread, you accused me of having multiple usernames, repeatedly kept calling me by a name that is not mine and made some unsavory insinuations about a husband of mine.
lanna wrote:
back peddaler..... so if your hubby was taking off to work or to walk a dog or something and happened to meet a little hottie and decided to "marry her" and make her his second wife you wouldn't get angry? how do you know he's not doing anything like that now?? oh and no ---- i was a part of that crack church they believe nothing like the mormons. and the mormon visiters center is behind the COC temple. i think you just go online and look ---- up. to make you sound like you know what you are talking about. oh and i am not nutty if you want i will give you my med records that say i am not. besides you never said what your position was. you just like arguing with people because it makes you feel better about yourself. it gives you a break in baiting women to keep away from your hubby. you posted on here more than anyother person telling me what i think is wrong. obviously you think i am important enough to argue with. i wanted you to leave it alone when you proved my point. but you didn't
lanna wrote:
i didn't back pedal if you read in my earlier posts i got drug through many of the known churches and COC was one of them. come on remember what i wrote. come on isn't it time for you to check your husbands email accts. you are so paranoid people will find out your secrets. you are still avoiding the question what is your stand on polygamy?
lanna wrote:
she was doing that towards you not me and you're poll stacking with your other sn's. don't deny it. besides you lean toward the illegal stuff don't you and you lie about stuff as well we all know your history so don't go saying you don't lie. who's gracie?
lanna wrote:
go back to the getto
lanna wrote:
that went over your head didn't it. actually the part i lived in was quite pleasant. it was quiet and nestled next to an elementary school, that i went to school at. we could walk in our neighborhood with out being accosted by college kids or old people who thought they ruled the world. how old are you now 53
Here you attack Patricia.
lanna wrote:
patricia is only funny when she has drunk to much and has posted something too off the wall
More personal attacks...
lanna wrote:
and how do you know this miss secretary
lanna wrote:
you mean the average joe who is a secretary at a school in topeka, who likes making little kids cry in many different ways, just because she feels superior
This all happened almost 1 month ago. Can you explain to all of us why your posts don't constitute personal attacks and if anyone questions something you post, it is a personal attack?
There are others threads where you have gone in and attacked.
http://discuss.larryville.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=42945I made a joke about a list of people here...
Gern_Blanston wrote:
oojoshua wrote:
Quote:
Can we make suggestions about who *shoudn't* be moderators?
Yes, I would be interested in getting a list of folks who are mis-behaving.
Please note: The more various users go tit-4-tat the more likely I am to suggest a policy where we simply shut down both accounts, ban the IP addresses and put in place a very stringent new account rules.
That is going to be a very, very long list and the end result will probably be that only about 10 users will be left on Larryville.
and you followed up right after me (What was that accusation you had about following others around?) and made this very rude comment.
lanna wrote:
we all know you won't be one of them
I could post more but this is already getting too long.
In summary, please spare us the song and dance of innocence on your part. No one is falling for it. It is about as credible as YH.